An Interview with James W. Eli, Jr. Part 5 Video

Get it off your chest – be the first to comment on this video!

An Interview with James W. Eli, Jr. Part 5

And it goes beyond in other words, it goes beyond just a racial interpretation of 14th Amendment, it’s a broader interpretation. So I think slaughterhouse comes in a very key time, it’s reading on a fresh sheet. And it will seem to suggest on the whole, slaughterhouse a fairly normal reading for the 14th Amendment. I think the two jury cases have already talked about, the two jury cases are not really out of step here because what the states have done there was so obvious, embarrassingly obvious. And I don’t much surprise if they would strike that down. It much more difficult of course if you have neural principles for obtaining the jury that you just happen of would like to people to show up much, much more difficult question. They have change quite dramatically and in ways that moved against any type of significant severe rights enforcement. Public opinion as I mentioned earlier I had largely lost interest in the things of reconstruction on the contrary they have much more issue in sectional reconciliation. The view was widely held including at the most universities that they were inherent racial differences between the whites and blacks and it was just foolish to try to order that it wouldn’t work anyway the observe effort to make the world over is William Gram somewhere once observed that you simply have to—the deal was certain differences and since most black lived in the south we wouldn’t make most sense to let some there make this adjustments. I think that is very much the attitude that for me is not an opinion and for me is the political culture and the Supreme Court pretty clearly comes to reflect that. For example Justice Brown who wipes the majority opinion plus he comes permission. He's not any southern little boy. But the time that Brown comes to the Supreme Court approximately 1950 for the first round the markets the great deal has change in American attitudes. Let's consider some of that in the line of forces. Number one, the United States has just come through World War II. World War II was fought with a great deal of egalitarian—that we were against Nazis and we were against the Imperial Japanese Government, in part because they were propagating dark one of racial superiority or some group that were for others. And then we’re doing horrible things to implement the doctrines. So almost everybody was propelled by the implication of these doctrines and because of these back last of World War II and that can strongly what was happening and you have been in Asia it made a good many people begin to re think assumptions about racial attitudes in this country attitudes they probably have examine very carefully for a long time. Now, I know this iron is here we fought World War II is a segregate of army but nonetheless change was a foot, change is actually a foot in the military because President Truman began to do segregation of the army even before the Supreme Court have rendered any decision. The world of changes, changes in American society more generally are national game have basic even a white men games if you will down to the 1940’s when Jackie Robinson became the first black player in the beginnings. Well, that great is some stir to be sure but that’s majority people accepted it and this was a very visible sport to many Americans. So I think this culture will changes were already occurring even before the Supreme Court had decided. But there still other changes. In the 1890’s because I mentioned before neither the congress nor the president showed any interest in the equal rights at all in fact they’ve made a very clear that they were going to be supported with the south. President Gilbert Cleveland was elected in those small measure was sudden electro vaults and he shortly was it’s going to start out coalition in the south is one of his major—part of his major program. By the 1950’s that change the love. The Truman administration is supported of equal life initiatives. Because of the great migration of many blacks in north in the early part of the 20th century black order had become a significant part of the political equation in a number of states. In fact one might not take the position that there was more political gain to be had by pushing civil rights then by retiring civil rights. So the political equations change, the general in electoral contact has change so much because of World War II and the course of World War II and then of course there's yet another factor that wise to cold war. With the arising of cold war United States perceived that it is in competition where the Soviet Union and whishing you with coming China to capture the legions of much to the worst population. Much to the worst population is being decolonized to that very time, and it’s not helpful to put it mildly to our diplomatic efforts to have formal segregation the law of the land to the large part of the country. The Supreme Court was seen brief from the justice department that clearly pointed out among other reasons why they might want to take a very close segregation that it was embarrassing diplomatically. In fact there's been a book written recently suggesting that the cold war origins of the civil rights it should not be minimize that should became a corporate attention. Now, you mix all this together and then you have a good Supreme Court largely left over and out from the domination of President Truman that in credit by domination there were number and number of Supreme Court who are much less in pathetic to take in a look at departure in the racial area then the court would have been in need in 90’s. It’s like day and night that it isn't to say that there were questions that could have been raise there was a lot president and there were separate schools and there were could be opposition very vocal opposition some of it well place to like my member of congress. But there was much greater where activity to a strike in favor of integration in the 1950’s than it would have been in the 1890’s. Now, this is not to say that the path of implementing Brown has been smooth you know it’s nothing so he did all. I thought this stage for resistance for years and manage to fight it all to war in the decade and that was not some considerable delay. And even today I'm mean there’s tremendous problems with essentially black urban areas and whites fling to southern and the difficulty about it. Meaning to integrate these schools but reflex is many parts of the country. I'm not sure in some way that the biggest impact to Brown hasn’t been as a catalyst to civil rights legislation and to civil rights advances to other areas then it actually has been bring you what integrate to schools.

Vat19

Unique gifts and unusual gift ideas.

http://www.vat19.com

And it goes beyond in other words, it goes beyond just a racial interpretation of 14th Amendment, it’s a broader interpretation. So I think slaughterhouse comes in a very key time, it’s reading on a fresh sheet. And it will seem to suggest on the whole, slaughterhouse a fairly normal reading for the 14th Amendment. I think the two jury cases have already talked about, the two jury cases are not really out of step here because what the states have done there was so obvious, embarrassingly obvious. And I don’t much surprise if they would strike that down. It much more difficult of course if you have neural principles for obtaining the jury that you just happen of would like to people to show up much, much more difficult question.

They have change quite dramatically and in ways that moved against any type of significant severe rights enforcement. Public opinion as I mentioned earlier I had largely lost interest in the things of reconstruction on the contrary they have much more issue in sectional reconciliation. The view was widely held including at the most universities that they were inherent racial differences between the whites and blacks and it was just foolish to try to order that it wouldn’t work anyway the observe effort to make the world over is William Gram somewhere once observed that you simply have to—the deal was certain differences and since most black lived in the south we wouldn’t make most sense to let some there make this adjustments.

I think that is very much the attitude that for me is not an opinion and for me is the political culture and the Supreme Court pretty clearly comes to reflect that. For example Justice Brown who wipes the majority opinion plus he comes permission. He's not any southern little boy.

But the time that Brown comes to the Supreme Court approximately 1950 for the first round the markets the great deal has change in American attitudes. Let's consider some of that in the line of forces. Number one, the United States has just come through World War II. World War II was fought with a great deal of egalitarian—that we were against Nazis and we were against the Imperial Japanese Government, in part because they were propagating dark one of racial superiority or some group that were for others. And then we’re doing horrible things to implement the doctrines.

So almost everybody was propelled by the implication of these doctrines and because of these back last of World War II and that can strongly what was happening and you have been in Asia it made a good many people begin to re think assumptions about racial attitudes in this country attitudes they probably have examine very carefully for a long time. Now, I know this iron is here we fought World War II is a segregate of army but nonetheless change was a foot, change is actually a foot in the military because President Truman began to do segregation of the army even before the Supreme Court have rendered any decision.

The world of changes, changes in American society more generally are national game have basic even a white men games if you will down to the 1940’s when Jackie Robinson became the first black player in the beginnings. Well, that great is some stir to be sure but that’s majority people accepted it and this was a very visible sport to many Americans. So I think this culture will changes were already occurring even before the Supreme Court had decided. But there still other changes.

In the 1890’s because I mentioned before neither the congress nor the president showed any interest in the equal rights at all in fact they’ve made a very clear that they were going to be supported with the south. President Gilbert Cleveland was elected in those small measure was sudden electro vaults and he shortly was it’s going to start out coalition in the south is one of his major—part of his major program.

By the 1950’s that change the love. The Truman administration is supported of equal life initiatives. Because of the great migration of many blacks in north in the early part of the 20th century black order had become a significant part of the political equation in a number of states. In fact one might not take the position that there was more political gain to be had by pushing civil rights then by retiring civil rights.

So the political equations change, the general in electoral contact has change so much because of World War II and the course of World War II and then of course there's yet another factor that wise to cold war. With the arising of cold war United States perceived that it is in competition where the Soviet Union and whishing you with coming China to capture the legions of much to the worst population. Much to the worst population is being decolonized to that very time, and it’s not helpful to put it mildly to our diplomatic efforts to have formal segregation the law of the land to the large part of the country.

The Supreme Court was seen brief from the justice department that clearly pointed out among other reasons why they might want to take a very close segregation that it was embarrassing diplomatically. In fact there's been a book written recently suggesting that the cold war origins of the civil rights it should not be minimize that should became a corporate attention. Now, you mix all this together and then you have a good Supreme Court largely left over and out from the domination of President Truman that in credit by domination there were number and number of Supreme Court who are much less in pathetic to take in a look at departure in the racial area then the court would have been in need in 90’s. It’s like day and night that it isn't to say that there were questions that could have been raise there was a lot president and there were separate schools and there were could be opposition very vocal opposition some of it well place to like my member of congress.

But there was much greater where activity to a strike in favor of integration in the 1950’s than it would have been in the 1890’s. Now, this is not to say that the path of implementing Brown has been smooth you know it’s nothing so he did all. I thought this stage for resistance for years and manage to fight it all to war in the decade and that was not some considerable delay. And even today I'm mean there’s tremendous problems with essentially black urban areas and whites fling to southern and the difficulty about it. Meaning to integrate these schools but reflex is many parts of the country.

I'm not sure in some way that the biggest impact to Brown hasn’t been as a catalyst to civil rights legislation and to civil rights advances to other areas then it actually has been bring you what integrate to schools.

Transcription by: Scribe4you Transcription Services